Skip to main content

Sunday 6 September — European Day of Jewish Culture: Bologna is Italy’s lead city. Great Synagogue, from 10 am.

The programme

Select your language

Comunità Ebraica di Bologna Kehillah di Bologna

Ki Tavo (29 August 2026)

By Rav Marco Del Monte

The basket worth more than gold
Drawn from some Shiurim of Rav Y. Metzgher

Parashat Ki Tavo opens with the solemn precept of the first fruits: “You shall take some of the first of all the fruit of the ground… and you shall put it in a basket and go to the place that HaShem your God will choose” (Devarim 26:2).

The Mishnah (Bikkurim 3:8) describes, however, a visually contrasting scene: “The wealthy brought their Bikkurim in vessels of silver and gold, while the poor brought them in baskets of peeled willow branches; the baskets and the Bikkurim were given to the Kohanim”. A paradox arises at once, which Rabbenu Ovadiah of Bartenura comments on with the talmudic saying: “Poverty runs after the poor” (Bava Kamma 92a). The rich man had his precious golden vessel returned to him, while the poor man was not even left his humble basket.

In an earlier reflection we set out some explanations of this apparent inequality:

  • Protecting dignity. The rich man had perfect fruit in abundance; the poor man, owning few trees, placed the best fruit on top and the plainer fruit below. So as not to shame him by emptying the basket, the Kohen took it whole.
  • The humility that is pleasing to HaShem. Precious metals risk stirring pride (“Every haughty heart is an abomination to HaShem”, Mishlei 16:5), whereas the humility of the poor man (“A contrite spirit is pleasing to God”, Tehillim 51:19) was received and raised up.
  • The sign of blessing (Siman Berachah). The Kohen took the basket with a wish: “Next year you will not come with this basket, but with vessels of gold”.

A deeper question remains, raised by the Tosefot Yom Tov (Bikkurim 3:8). The Torah and the Sages always laid down uniform standards so as not to create humiliating inequalities:

  • On Tu BeAv the daughters of Israel danced in the vineyards wearing borrowed white garments, “so as not to shame those who had none” (Mishnah, Taanit 4:8; Talmud Bavli, Taanit 26b).
  • For the Tachrichim, the burial shrouds, Rabban Gamliel ordained the use of plain linen cloths so that the cost would not drive the poor to abandon their dead out of shame (Talmud Bavli, Moed Katan 27b).
  • Even in the preceding Mishnah (Bikkurim 3:7) the Chachamim ruled that the declaration be read out word by word to everyone — both to those who could recite it and to those who could not read — precisely so that no one would feel inadequate.

Why then, in Mishnah 8, do the Sages allow the rich man to come with gold and the poor man with wicker?

The Malbim’s comment overturns the psychological and existential perspective entirely: the poor man had nothing whatever to be ashamed of. The rich man could buy a sumptuous basket, delegating the effort to his money; the poor man went himself along the rivers, gathered the willow branches, peeled them and wove the basket with his own ten fingers. In those fibres there was not merely a container, but his devotion, his time and his inner labour.

In Heaven, worth is not measured by outward appearance but by the effort pressed into the act (“When you eat the labour of your hands, you shall be happy and it shall be well with you”, Tehillim 128). That hand-woven basket went straight up onto the altar because it was steeped in the soul of the one who had made it.

It is an extraordinary lesson for our Avodat HaShem. We are used to comparing results: how much someone studies, how many mitzvot they perform, how well they manage to pray with kavanah. But we almost never know the hidden effort behind those results. For one person an hour of study is natural; for another, winning twenty minutes means fighting tiredness and distraction. For one, rising for Shacharit is a habit; for another, every morning is a small battle. From the outside we see only the fruit. HaShem sees the basket as well.

This is the principle taught by Ben He He: “according to the effort is the reward” (Pirkei Avot 5:23). Perhaps this is why Chazal did not make those baskets equal: because before HaShem equality does not mean being identical. Each person arrives with his own vessel, built out of his own history, his own means and his own difficulties. The golden vessel acquired without effort is given back. The simple basket, woven with great kavanah and toil, remains in the Beit HaMikdash.

For people see how much what you brought is worth; HaShem sees how much of yourself you put into bringing it.

Shabbat Shalom

Translated from the Italian with Google Gemini. The Italian text is the original.